Skip to main content
  • EN
  • ES
  • FR
  • PT

HIPs

  • HIP Products
    • Briefs
    • Planning Guides
    • HIP Webinars
    • Papers
  • Resources
  • Engage
  • Overview
    • HIP Principles
    • HIP Development
    • SPG Development
    • History
  • About Us
    • Co-Sponsors
    • Partners
    • Advisory Group
    • P&D Team
    • Technical Experts
Home > High Impact Practice Briefs > Leaders and Managers
Enabling Environment

Leaders and Managers: Making Family Planning Programs Work

High Impact Practice:Develop and support capacity to lead and manage family planning programs.
© 2013 SC4CCM/JSI, Courtesy of Photoshare

Download:

Background

Leadership and management are both essential elements to developing successful family planning programs and can help ensure resources are used effectively to achieve results (Richey & Salem, 2008; WHO, 2007b; Dieleman & Harnmeijer, 2006; Beaglehole & Dal Poz, 2003).

Leadership and management approaches are multifaceted and thus identifying direct or causal links between such approaches and improved reproductive health outcomes is challenging. Illustrative models, however, demonstrate the relationship between strong leadership and management and improved health outcomes (WHO, 2007a) while reflecting common skills and qualities (Peterson et al., 2011; WHO, 2007b; Galer et al., 2005) (see Figure).

Figure 01.
Leading and Managing for Results Model
Source: Adapted from Management Sciences for Health’s Leading & Managing for Results Model.
Leadership practices comprise:
  • Scanning for opportunities: seeking out and identifying alternatives and options
  • Setting direction to focus efforts: envisioning purpose, aspiration, and goals
  • Aligning partners and mobilizing community: engaging community into program activities
  • Inspiring staff to improve work climate: investing in various opportunities and approaches to improve quality of employees’ output
  • Governing responsibly: exercising control for mutual benefit
Management practices encompass:
  • Planning: deciding in advance what is to be done
  • Organizing structures: acquiring, maintaining, and retaining human resources and developing intentional patterns of relationships among people and other resources
  • Implementing activities through coordinated systems: designing and using systems to identify, capture, structure, value, leverage, and share information/knowledge/intellectual assets
  • Monitoring and evaluation: setting up processes to track activities against plans and to assess performance of those activities
  • Refining the program: using assessment results to refine program activities

Leaders and managers must work in tandem to effect positive change. Good leaders with strong vision can be poor managers who are unable to motivate and retain staff to achieve goals. Similarly, a good manager who understands staffing, logistics, and financing can lack the vision and direction needed for success. Thus, while each function encompasses a unique set of characteristics, leadership and management are most effective when practiced together (Kotter, 2001).

Strengthening and supporting leadership and management in family planning programs is one of several High Impact Practices in Family Planning (HIPs) identified by a technical advisory group of international experts. When scaled up and institutionalized, HIPs will maximize investments in a comprehensive family planning strategy (HIPs, 2014). For more information about other HIPs, see http://www.fphighimpactpractices.org.

Leadership and Management at All Levels of the Health System

Decentralization is a critical component of health reform in many developing countries, affecting the way services are structured, resourced, and staffed (Kolehmainen-Aitken, 2004). As the lowest levels of the health systems increasingly manage services, the need for leadership and management at all levels of the health system is even more crucial. A review of Indonesia’s experience with decentralization concluded, “Decentralization … resulted in less emphasis on family planning in many districts/municipalities and so has aggravated these adverse trends. … Decentralization … does impact on the political instruments and operational strategies available to the central government agencies to revitalize the family planning program when these departments and agencies no longer have line authority, staff or budgets to direct field operations” (Hull & Mosley, 2009). Different approaches may be needed at various levels of the health system (see Table 1).

“Leaders set the strategic vision and mobilize the efforts towards its realization while good managers ensure effective organization and utilization of resources to achieve results and meet the aims.”
– WHO, 2007a
Table 01.

Illustrative Examples of Leadership and Management Practices Throughout the Health System

Health System Level Leadership Practices Management Practices Country Example
Global Regions Identify economies of scale. Standardize curricula for health workers and develop regional protocols for research. West Africa Health Organization (WAHO), the health arm of the Economic Community of West African States, implemented a coordinated informed buying system for contraceptive commodities to ensure orders and prices were standardized across the region. WAHO also supported the standardization of medical and nursing school curricula to ensure standard quality of service provision when health workers migrated across borders (Clemmons & Thatte, 2011).
National Articulate a country’s family planning goals and priorities. Set minimum standards of quality, outline roles and responsibilities, facilitate coordination, guide resource mobilization, and determine timelines for program rollout (HIPs, 2013). Bangladesh’s 2011 Health Policy is based on the country’s constitutional obligation to the right to health. The policy includes objectives to strengthen and expedite the family planning program, both to attain replacement fertility and to make the program more acceptable, easily available, and effective among extremely poor and low-income communities (HIPs, 2013; Khuda, 2010).
District Make certain health service decisions with political and budgetary autonomy at the local level. Develop systems to strengthen reporting and management of commodities to ensure accurate forecasting and prevent stockouts at district and sub-district levels. In 2006 the government of Rwanda decentralized health service delivery including family planning. Ensuring adequate human resources and commodities at the district level was critical to maintaining quality service delivery. Decentralization enabled greater community involvement, which helped increase support of family planning, particularly among certain populations such as young people and men (Muhoza, 2013).
Community/Service Delivery Support task sharing policies. Ensure adequate management and supervision of community health workers (CHWs). Between 2012 and 2013, CHWs in Senegal began providing injectable contraceptives (DMPA). Leadership from the Ministry of Health (MOH), robust training, and supervision resulted in safe and effective implementation (FHI 360, 2013).

Which challenges can strong leadership and management help countries address?

Improve work climate. In family planning programs, provider-level barriers to positive health outcomes include a lack of knowledge and skills among providers about contraceptive methods, low health worker motivation to provide family planning, long wait times for clients to receive services, and disrespectful treatment of clients (Tumlinson et al., 2013). Many of these issues can be addressed with adequate leadership and management practices to help motivate staff and improve the quality of services, such as recognizing the need for additional staff training, supportive supervision of providers, staff recognition, job aids, and improving logistic systems (GHSP, 2013; Tumlinson et al., 2013; Smith et al., 2012). Other analyses have demonstrated the importance of management practices such as having job descriptions for clinical staff as key to providing quality family planning services (Thatte & Choi, 2015; Bennett et al., 2000).

Health workers repeatedly report poor leadership and management by their managers or supervisors as a key factor in their lack of motivation, found a systematic review of health worker motivation (Willis-Shattuck et al., 2008). Hospital or clinical management was reported in 80% of the reviewed studies as an important factor for health worker motivation. Other themes directly related to management issues included financial incentives (90%), career development (85%), work appreciation/recognition (70%), and ensuring the availability of resources (75%). Having a strong organizational mission is another motivating factor for health workers (Franco et al., 2002; Grindle, 1997), which can be achieved with strong leadership and vision.

Improve organizational and management systems. While there is growing acknowledgment of the need to increase the numbers and quality of clinical providers (WHO, 2006), a recent report also highlighted the need for these professionals to be equipped with leadership and management skills to carry out the “efficient handling of scarce resources in conditions of uncertainty”(Frenk et al., 2010). A family planning and health worker analysis of 10 African countries concluded that leadership and management functions such as the way “health workers are trained, distributed, and supported may be as important as how many health workers are available” (Pacque-Margolis et al., 2013).

Specialized health manager cadres are rare. Physicians and nurses are often put into positions to lead and manage health facilities without the skills to do so. These individuals are often tasked with stretching scarce resources for programming (Gillespie, 2004). While trained clinically, they often lack skills around human resource distribution, resource allocation, and recruitment (Kabene et al., 2006; Mathauer & Imhoff, 2006; Rowe et al., 2005), resulting in poorly managed health facilities. In addition, shortages of drugs and supplies, weak logistics systems, poor supervisory support, and unclear roles and responsibilities contribute to poor performance, low staff morale, and high staff turnover (Willis-Shattuck et al., 2008; Dieleman & Harnmeijer, 2006; Egger et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2004; Kolehmainen-Aitken, 2004; Dussault & Dubois, 2003). In Kenya, over 70% of clinical staff with management responsibility surveyed reported they had either “no preparation” or “very inadequate preparation” for this part of their work (MSH, 2008).

Improve the capacity to respond to change and to scale-up effective practices. Country experience has demonstrated that leadership and management skills are necessary to move from small-scale pilot studies to full-scale country implementation. In Ethiopia, key informants cited “leadership by the government” and improvement in health systems including logistics and supervision as major factors for successful scale-up of family planning (USAID, 2011). In Ghana, the scale-up efforts of the Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) program documented that weak leadership and supervision in many districts contributed to a “lack of focus and clarity” about the program (Awoonor-Williams et al., 2013). Leadership and management training around prioritization, planning, and identifying a shared vision among implementers and the community later contributed to successful scale-up of the program in key regions (Awoonor-Williams et al., 2013). A review of successful scale-up of health programs documented strong leadership and management as being a critical factor for success (Levine, 2007). Political leadership can help facilitate resources and commitment, but leadership and management at the implementation level through the providers or the health system is equally critical and will ultimately drive the successful scale-up of health interventions (Levine, 2007).

What is the impact?

Demonstrating a direct causal impact of leadership and management on health outcomes and health service outputs is an ongoing challenge (Peterson et al., 2011). Models, as in Figure 1, can measure the effects of leadership and management practices using proximate indicators, such as change in work climates, improved organizational management, or improved capacity to respond to a changing environment.

A systematic review of leadership, management, and governance strategies concluded that approaches using multiple interventions result in more comprehensive outcomes than a single-intervention strategy (Edward et al., 2013). See Table 2 for illustrative examples from Afghanistan, Bolivia, and Egypt of results achieved with improved leadership and management interventions.

Table 02.

Illustrative Results of Selected Leadership and Management Interventions

Country (Reference) Scale of Implemen-tation Approach Results
Afghanistan (Tawfik et al.,2014) 5 hospitals Modern collaborative quality improvement method:

  • Facility staff trained in leadership and management.
  • Teams conducted root-cause analyses.
  • Teams identified key interventions and indicators to monitor progress and achieve desired results.
Participants mobilized resources to improve infrastructure and counseling, such as postpartum counseling with husbands and mothers-in-law. Before the intervention almost no women received a method after delivery. Less than a year later, 30% of postpartum women left the facility with their preferred method (calculated based on published data).
Bolivia, 2007–2011 (Peterson et al.,2011) Organizational development (NGO) Team-based training program and monitoring system:

  • 65 senior leaders trained in change management, negotiation, strategic thinking,
    motivation, and human resource management.
Improvements in organizational efficiency, work climate, and service delivery.
Egypt, 1995–1997 (Hong et al., 2011; Peterson et al., 2011) National (public sector) Gold Star quality improvement branding:

  • Community, providers, and other stakeholders developed 101 minimum essential service requirements to standardize quality.
  • Providers were trained, and district supervision teams visited facilities to regularly monitor quality.
  • Gold Star branding was heavily promoted, and quality check results were widely publicized.
Contraceptive prevalence rates increased from 47.9% to 54.5% from 1995 to 1997. An evaluation four years after the intervention found quality remained higher in Gold Star facilities compared with non-Gold Star facilities.

How to do it: Tips from implementation experience

A range of leadership and management improvement approaches have been implemented across regions. Some are embedded in quality improvement or quality assurance interventions while others are stand-alone programs focused exclusively on improving leadership and management skills. While there is no one way to build leadership and management capacity, below are a few key issues to consider:

Support leaders and managers. Developing strong leaders and managers requires support in a variety of areas, including financial resources, commodities, mentorship, clear processes, information, technology, equipment, facilities, and knowledge. Support also includes intangibles such as ideas, encouragement, feedback, and time to engage in various communities of practice. Mentorship and coaching is especially important to developing new leaders (Nzinga et al., 2013). This support should be reinforced by country-specific policies, legislation, relationships and work culture. For information on other enabling environment and infrastructural issues, see the HIP briefs on Policy, Health Communication, and Financing Commodities and Services.

Professionalize leadership and management roles. Standards related to leadership and management competencies are unfortunately rare, and there is no reporting or certifications for those who lead and manage family planning programs (MSH, 2013). However, the climate is changing. Recently the MOH in 6 September 2015 Kenya committed to professionalizing leadership and management by creating the Kenya Institute for Health Systems Management to train cadres of workers in health management and health systems strengthening (MSH, 2013).

Train teams that work together through applied learning. Applied learning is the most effective way to gain practical skills in leadership and management, yielding skill retention rates of up to 75% compared with 5–10% from only reading or lectures (NTL, 2011). In addition, using applied-learning approaches with teams working together in real workplace settings has more positive results than sending individuals to off-site leadership and management trainings in which the curriculum is not necessarily directly applicable to their work. Experience from Ghana found stand-alone workshops to be an ineffective tool for leadership training (Awoonor-Williams et al., 2013), and most quality improvement approaches center around a team-based approach (APHA, 2011). Management training of district health officials in Latin America had the most effect when the organizational and team structure participated in the leadership and management training together (Dorros, 2006).

Include leadership and management skills in pre-service training. To build and sustain capacity for leadership and management, such skills should be incorporated into pre-service training for health care providers. In Uganda, leadership and management training has been incorporated into medical and nursing school curricula, in collaboration with Makarere University. In addition to receiving clinical training, students are trained on human resources management, finance, logistics, and leadership . In Kenya, leadership and management training has been incorporated into pre-service training for physicians and nurses at the University of Nairobi and the Kenya Medical training college. Efforts to add this type of training into other university curricula are underway (MSH, 2013).

Connect with a community of practice. Connect leaders and managers to a larger community that shares common visions or goals for family planning (Wheatley, 2002). Establishing or connecting with a community of practice enables leaders and managers to develop a shared repertoire of resources: experiences, stories, tools, and ways of addressing recurring problems (Wenger-Trayner & Wenger-Trayner, 2015). At national, regional, district, sub-district, or facility levels, communities of practice could be established through mechanisms such as Technical Working Groups (TWGs) or a Stakeholder Leadership Group (Gormley & McCaffery, 2011) or through the use of technology to establish communication arenas such as listservs and websites. Such groups can also serve as advocacy groups for strengthening leadership and galvanizing commitment around family planning investments, another important high-impact practice for family planning programs.

“Mentors provide professional networks, outlets for frustration, career counseling, general life advice, and most importantly, an extra voice telling their mentee that they are smart enough and capable enough.”
– adapted from Gerald Chertavian - https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/g/gerald_chertavian.html
Tools and Resources

The following resources provide an illustrative range of materials, including training manuals, quality improvement techniques, and tools to monitor leadership and management processes, to help facilitate leadership and management practices throughout the health system.

  • Managers Who Lead: A Handbook for Improving Health Services. Provides managers with practical guidelines and approaches for leading teams to identify and find solutions for their challenges. Staff at any level of the health system can use these concepts to improve their ability to lead and manage well. Available from: http://projects.msh.org/Documents/upload/MWL-2008-edition.pdf
  • Human Resources Management Assessment Approach. Guides policy makers, managers, and human resources practitioners to understand and respond to human resource management challenges. Available from: http://www.capacityplus.org/files/resources/hrm-assessmentapproach.pdf
  • Leadership Development Program. A team-based approach to leadership training focused on the basic practices of leading and managing, creating an enabling work environment, and creating sustainable teams that are committed to continuously improving services. More information available from: https://www.msh.org/our-work/health-systems/leadershipmanagement-governance/leadership
  • Health Care Improvement Project (HCI) Standard Evaluation System. A tool to strengthen documentation, analysis, and synthesis of learning by quality improvement teams. Available from: https://www.usaidassist.org/resources/learning-andimprovement-system-strengtheningdocumentation-analysis-and-synthesis

For more information about HIPs, please contact the HIP team.

References

American Public Health Association (APHA). Quality improvement in public health: it works! Washington, DC: APHA; 2011. Available from: https://www.apha.org/~/media/files/pdf/factsheets/qi_in_ph_it_works.ashx

Awoonor-Williams JK, Sory ES, Nyonator FK, Phillips JF, Wang C, Schmitt LM. Lessons learned from scaling up a community-based health program in the Upper East Region of northern Ghana. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(1):117-133. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-12-00012

Beaglehole R, Dal Poz MR. Public health workforce: challenges and policy issues. Hum Resour Health. 2003;1(1):4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-1-4

Bennett S, Gzirishvili D, Kanfer R. An in-depth analysis of the determinants and consequences of worker motivation in two hospitals in Tbilisi, Georgia. Bethesda, MD: Partnerships for Health Reform, Abt Associates; 2000. Available from: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnacl100.pdf

Chen L, Evans T, Anand S, Boufford JI, Brown H, Chowdhury M, et al. Human resources for health: overcoming the crisis. Lancet. 2004;364(9449):1984-1990.

Clemmons L, Lo A, Thatte N. Performance evaluation of USAID’s contributions in the strengthening of the institutional and technical capacities of the West Africa Health Organization (WAHO) 2003-2011: final report. Washington, DC: USAID; 2011.

Dieleman M, Harnmeijer JW. Improving health worker performance: in search of promising practices. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. Available from: http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/improving_hw_ performance.pdf

Dorros GL. Building management capacity to rapidly scale up health services and health outcomes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. Available from: http://www.who.int/management/DorrosPaper020206.pdf

Dussault G, Dubois CA. Human resources for health policies: a critical component in health policies. Human Resour Health. 2003;1(1):1. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-1-1

Edward A, Branchini C, Paichadze, N, Manesse F, Morrow R. Evidence of leadership, management and governance in low and middle income country health systems–a systematic review. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University; 2013.

Egger D, Travis P, Dovlo D, Hawken L. Strengthening management in low-income countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. Available from: http://www.who.int/management/Making%20HSWork%201.pdf

FHI 360. Senegal: community health workers successfully provide intramuscular injectable contraception. Research Triangle Park: FHI 360; 2013. Available from: http://www.fhi360.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/community-health-workers-intramuscular-depo-senegal.pdf

Franco LM, Bennett S, Kanfer R. Health sector reform and public sector health worker motivation: a conceptual framework. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(8):1255-1266.

Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;376(9756):1923- 1958.

Galer JB, Vrisendorp S, Ellis A. Managers who lead: a handbook for improving health services. Cambridge, MA: Management Sciences for Health; 2005. Available from: https://www.msh.org/resources/managers-who-lead-ahandbook-for-improving-health-services

Gillespie DG. Whatever happened to family planning, and, for that matter, reproductive health? Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2004;30(1):34-38. Available from: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3003404.html

Global Health: Science and Practice (GHSP). Provider-generated barriers to health services access and quality still persist. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(3):294. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00162

Gormley W, McCaffery J. Guidelines for forming and sustaining human resources for health stakeholder leadership groups. Washington, DC: CapacityPlus, IntraHealth International; 2011. Available from: http://www.capacityplus.org/guidelines-forming-and-sustaining-human-resources-health-stakeholder-leadership-groups

Grindle MS. Divergent cultures? When public organizations perform well in developing countries. World Dev. 1997;25:481–495.

High-Impact Practices in Family Planning (HIPs). Family planning high-impact practice list. Washington, DC: USAID; 2014. Available from: https://www.fphighimpactpractices.org/high-impact-practices-in-family-planning-list

High-Impact Practices in Family Planning (HIPs). Family planning policy: building the foundation for systems, services, and supplies. Washington, DC: USAID; 2013. Available from: http://www.fphighimpactpractices.org/briefs/policy

Hong R, Mishra V, Fronczak N. Impact of a quality improvement programme on family planning services in Egypt. East Mediterr Health J. 2011;17(1):4-10. Available from: http://www.emro.who.int/emhj/V17/01/17_1_2011_0004_0010.pdf

Hull T, Mosley H. Revitalization of family planning in Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: Bappenas, BKKBN, and UNFPA; 2009. Available from: href=”https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Terence_Hull/publication/265396314_Revitalization_of_Family_Planning_in_Indonesia/links/540d89700cf2f2b29a386553.pdf/download?version=va

Kabene SM, Orchard C, Howard JM, Soriano MA, Leduc R. The importance of human resources management in health care: a global context. Hum Resour Health. 2006;4:20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-4-20

Khuda BE, Barkat S. The Bangladesh Family Planning Programme: achievements, gaps and the way forward. New York: UNFPA; 2010. Available from: http://www.icomp.org.my/new/uploads/fpconsultation/Bangladesh.pdf

Kolehmainen-Aitken RL. Decentralization and its impact on the health workforce: perspectives from managers, workers and national leaders. Human Resour Health. 2004;2:5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-2-5

Kotter JP. What leaders really do. Harvard Business Review. 2001 Dec. Available from: https://hbr.org/2001/12/what-leaders-really-do

Levine R. Case studies in global health: millions saved. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2007.

Management Sciences for Health (MSH). Report on management and leadership development gaps for Kenya health managers, Nov 2007–August 2008. Cambridge, MA: MSH; 2008.

Management Sciences for Health (MSH). Paving the way toward professionalizing leadership and management in healthcare. eManager. 2013;(2):1-28. Available from: http://www.lmgforhealth.org/sites/default/files/files/eManager%20Professionalizing%20Leadership%20and%20Management%20in%20Healthcare.pdf

Mathauer I, Imhoff I. Health worker motivation in Africa: the role of non-financial incentives and human resource management tools. Human Resour Health. 2006;4:24. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-4-24

Muhoza DN, Rutayisire PC, Umubyeyi A. Measuring the success of family planning initiatives in Rwanda: a multivariate decomposition analysis. Calverton, MD: ICF International; 2013. Available from: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnaea630.pdf

National Training Lab (NTL). Learning retention pyramid. Arlington, VA: NTL; 2011.

Nzinga J, Mbaabu L, English M. Service delivery in Kenyan district hospitals–what can we learn from literature on mid-level managers? Human Resour Health. 2013;11(1):10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-11-10

Pacque-Margolis S, Cox C, Puckette A, Schaefer L. Exploring contraceptive use differentials in Sub-Saharan Africa through a workforce lens. Washington, DC: CapacityPlus, IntraHealth International; 2013. Available from: http://www.capacityplus.org/exploring-contraceptive-usedifferentials-in-sub-saharan-africa-health-workforce-lens

Peterson EA, Dwyer J, Howze-Shiplett M, Davsion CY, Wilson K, Noykhovich E. Presence of leadership and management in global health programs: compendium of case studies. Washington, DC: Center for Global Health, George Washington University; 2011. Available from: http://www.lmgforhealth.org/sites/default/files/files/eManager%20Professionalizing%20Leadership%20and%20Management%20in%20Healthcare.pdf

Richey C, Salem RM. Elements of success in family planning programming. Population Reports. 2008;J(57). Available from: https://www.k4health.org/toolkits/info-publications/elements-success-family-planning-programming

Rowe AK, de Savigny D, Lanata CF, Victora CG. How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in low-resource settings? Lancet. 2005;366(9490):1026-1035.

Smith S, Broughton E, Coly A. Institutionalization of improvement in 15 HCI-supported countries. Bethesda, MD: University Research Co., LLC; 2012. Available from: http://www.encompassworld.com/sites/default/files/institutionalization__of_improvement.pdf

Tawfik Y, Rahnimzai M, Ahmadzai M, Clark PA, Kamgang E. Integrating family planning into postpartum care through modern quality improvement: experience from Afghanistan. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014;2(2):226-233. Available from:  http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-1300166

Thatte N, Choi YJ. Does human resource management improve family planning service quality? Analysis from the Kenya Service Provision Assessment 2010. Health Policy Plann. 2015;30(3):356-367. http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/content/30/3/356.full.pdf+html

Tumlinson K, Speizer IS, Archer LH, Behetsa F. Simulated clients reveal factors that may limit contraceptive use in Kisumu, Kenya. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(3):407-416. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00075

USAID/Africa Bureua; USIAD/Population and Reproductive Health; Ethiopia Federal Ministry of Health; Malawi Ministry of Health; Rwanda Ministry of Health. Three successful sub-Saharan Africa family planning programs: lessons for meeting the MDGs. Washington, DC: USAID; 2011. Available from: http://www.fhi360.org/resource/three-successful-subsaharan-africa-family-planning-programs-lessons-meeting-mdgs

Wenger-Trayner E, Wenger-Trayner B. Introduction to communities of practice: a brief overview of the concept and its uses. [place unknown]: EB Wenger-Trayner; 2015. Available from: http://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/

Wheatley M. Supporting pioneering leaders as communities of practice: how to rapidly develop new leaders in great numbers. Waterloo, Ontario: Tamarack; 2002. Available from: http://tamarackcci.ca/files/pioneer_leaders_wheatley.pdf.

Willis-Shattuck M, Bidwell P, Thomas S, Wyness L, Blaauw D, Ditlopo P. Motivation and retention of health workers in developing countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research. 2008;8(1):247. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-247

World Health Organization (WHO). Towards better leadership and management in health: report on an international consultation on strengthening leadership and management in low-income countries. Geneva: WHO; 2007a. Available from: http://www.who.int/management/working_paper_10_en_opt.pdf

World Health Organization (WHO). Everybody’s business: strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO’s framework for action. Geneva: WHO; 2007b. Available from: http://www.who.int/entity/healthsystems/strategy/everybodys_business.pdf?ua=1

World Health Organization (WHO). The world health report 2006: working together for health. Geneva: WHO; 2006. Available from: http://www.who.int/whr/2006/en/

Suggested Citation

High-Impact Practices in Family Planning (HIPs). Leaders and managers: making family planning programs work. Washington, DC: USAID; 2015 Sep. Available from: https://www.fphighimpactpractices.org/briefs/leaders-and-managers.

Acknowledgements

This document was originally drafted by Juan Carlos Alegre, Joseph Dwyer, Reshma Trasi, Nandita Thatte, and Temi Ifafore. Critical review and helpful comments were provide by Safia Ahsan, Michal Avni, Monica Bautista, Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli, Elaine Charurat, Oscar Cordon, Joan Craft, Asa Cuzin, Peggy D’Adamo, Selemawit Desta, Ellen Eiseman, Alfredo Fort, Mary Lyn Gaffield, Jill Gay, Jay Gribble, Karen Hardee, Roy Jacobstein, Baker Maggwa, Ados May, Andres McAlister, Erin Mielke, Ayman Mohsen, Nuriye Ortayli, Gael O’Sullivan, Jennifer Pope, Shannon Pryor, Suzanne Reier, Diana Santillan, Lois Schaefer, Amani Selim, Mahesh Shukla, Shelley Snyder, John Townsend, and Mary Vandenbroucke.

This HIP brief is endorsed by: Abt Associates, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, CARE, Chemonics International, EngenderHealth, FHI 360, Georgetown University/Institute for Reproductive Health, International Planned Parenthood Federation, IntraHealth International, Jhpiego, John Snow, Inc., Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Management Sciences for Health, Marie Stopes International, Palladium, PATH, Pathfinder International, Population Council, Population Reference Bureau, Population Services International, Save the Children, United Nations Population Fund, U.S. Agency for International Development, and University Research Co., LLC.

The World Health Organization/Department of Reproductive Health and Research has contributed to the development of the technical content of these documents which are viewed as a summary of evidence and field experience. It is intended that these briefs are used in conjunction with WHO Family Planning Tools and Guidelines: http://www.who.int/topics/family_planning/en/.

  • High Impact Practice
  • Background
  • Which challenges can strong leadership and management help countries address?
  • What is the impact?
  • How to do it: Tips from implementation experience
  • Tools and Resources
  • References
  • Suggested Citation
  • Acknowledgements
  • Other

CONNECT

  • Twitter
  • YouTube

QUICK LINKS

  • Overview
  • HIP Development
  • HIP List
  • HIP Updates

CONNECT

  • Twitter
  • YouTube

© 2021 Johns Hopkins University, All Rights Reserved.

  • Contact Us
  • Credits
The HIPs represent a diverse and results-oriented partnership encompassing a wide range of stakeholders and experts. As such, the information in HIP materials does not necessarily reflect the views of each co-sponsor or partner organization.
  • Submit a Comment